Welcome to the works of Manfred DavidmannWork and Pay: Taxing the Poor and Reducing their PensionsFundamental reports relevant to today's problems and to a better future |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to Other Subjects; Other Publications |
Contents ListWork and Pay: Taxing the Poor and Reducing their PensionsPay (Pay, Wage, Salary, Remuneration, Emoluments)Pay is wage or salary plus any share of profits. It includes payments and fringe benefits such as assistance with house purchase, life insurance, private pension and social insurance contributions by the employer, car and travelling expenses, paid holidays and benefits provided by government. Pay is pay, no matter what it is called. There is no difference between 'pay', 'remuneration' or 'emoluments' as long as we include all direct and indirect pre-tax payments and services received from the employer. Pay Increments (Merit, Cost of Living, Betterment)
Work and PayThe 'Work and Pay' reports illustrate how National Remuneration Scales are used (see figure 2) to show clearly, reliably and precisely
While profits, dividends and 'capital gains' increase automatically, a bitter struggle develops as owners and employers attempt to use 'inflation' as an excuse for reducing labour costs, that is wage rates, wages and salaries of the working population, so as to increase profits still further. Employees are then not compensated for increased skill, experience and responsibility (increased merit), do not receive their share of the increasing national income and wealth (the betterment), do not receive merit increases and betterment increases. {4 clm4.html} So owners and employers will, when they can, pressurise the working population into accepting even lower rates of pay by increasing the working population's needs. Doing so by advocating greater unemployment, reducing social security, reducing national health service provisions, weakening the quality of education (knowledge, clear thinking, understanding, objective evaluation). Here is an example. Since 1980 the UKs Tory government has withheld from old-age pensioners their share of the increasing national income and wealth (their 'Betterment'), for no apparent good reason, amounting to something like 2 percent of their pension every year. Pensions had been linked to the index of average earnings but in 1980 they were linked to the cost-of-living index. As a result, their 1998 pensions were a fraction of what they ought to have been, would have had to be increased by 34 percent just to reach the level at which they should have been. And pensioners would still have had to be compensated for the moneys withheld from them without good reason by the government since 1980. This attack on the standard of living of old-age pensioners has continued since then and still continues. Such attacks on the living standards of the working population are misleadingly called a 'fight (or battle) against inflation' to persuade the working population to tighten its belts, to reduce its standard of living, so as to increase profits. Index LinkingIndex-linking is an accepted way of taking the heat out of employer and employee pay bargaining. After index linking, pay bargaining can concentrate on the main issue, namely on how to share out the increased value created by the joint effort of both sides, and on how to adjust national differentials to ensure that no one section gains unfairly at the expense of others and to balance out inequalities. Consider how index linking operates in relation to the increasing cost of living. Owners' profits (dividends plus capital gain) increase automatically whenever costs increase. So profits are in effect linked to costs, to inflation. Linking of pay to a cost of living index takes the heat out of employer and employee pay bargaining, reduces confrontation and strife, eliminates having to struggle just to maintain one's place. It is at times applied to essential public services such as medical, fire, police, teaching and government. Pay is reviewed at intervals and is increased according to changes in the index. If the index has increased by 2 per cent say, then pay is increased by 2 per cent. Another way of linking is to increase pay by a given percentage whenever the index has increased by that percentage. But the cost of living index should reliably reflect the cost of living of the working population, by its composition and weighting, and be protected against politically motivated change which favours one side or the other. For example the index needs to be protected against misleading changes of the kind which try to replace a validly compiled, appropriate and easily understood 'cost-of-living' index with something else.
Such misleading developments are particularly harmful because we have, and have had for many years, the knowledge, understanding and means for automatically increasing pay and pensions in line with the cost of living, allowing at the same time for increased merit (knowledge and experience) and the betterment (share of increased national income). Index linking is one aspect of this process. Inequality and ChangeWe need to become aware of processes which redistribute income to benefit a few at the expense of the many. We need to see what is actually happening, the extent to which it is taking place, and what the effects are. And we need to counter such trends and manipulations. Inequalities increase during a time of unemployment, during economic crisis and stagnation. But differentials and poverty increase even when there is full employment in an affluent society as long as attention remains focused on percentage increases instead of on amounts. The same percentage increase means a far greater amount at the top compared with the bottom of the income scale. In this way inflation redistributes take-home purchasing power from the bottom to the top. The great and increasing inequality between the well-off and the rest of the population is revealed when one looks at the amounts each receive as their share of the increasing national wealth. Merely to prevent inequality increasing, that is to prevent it from getting worse, we need to give automatic increases which fully compensate for an individual's increased skill, knowledge, experience and responsibility (increased merit), for inflation (increasing cost of living), and which provide him with his share of the increasing national income and wealth (the betterment increase). But we have, and have had for many years, the knowledge, understanding and means for automatically increasing pay and pensions in line with the cost of living, while allowing at the same time for increased merit and the betterment, by means of index linking. Inequality has been defined and measured and the unequal sharing out of additional purchasing power has been going on for many years. The increasing differential between poverty at the bottom and luxury at the top is undermining the internal strength of our society as those who see themselves in real and in relative poverty, do complain, demonstrate, organise and disrupt. Short DescriptionsThe material quoted here was first published in the following reports by Manfred Davidmann:
Manfred DavidmannManfred Davidmann is an internationally well-known and respected scientist and author of a number of books and reports which have had and are having considerable impact. His work usually breaks new ground and opens up new understanding and is written in meaningful and easily understood language. Outstanding is that his work is generally accepted as factual, objective and unbiased. Other Subjects; Other Publications
The Site Overview page has links to all individual Subject Index Pages which between them list the works by Manfred Davidmann which are available on the Internet, with short descriptions and links for downloading. To see the Site Overview page, click Overview |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Manfred Davidmann All rights reserved worldwide. See Terms of Use Updated 2021:
|