Genesis: Differentiating Between Good and Evilby Manfred Davidmann |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to Other Subjects; Other Publications |
Contents
Relevant Current and Associated Works Relevant Subject Index Pages and Site Overview Introduction and OverviewThis report is one of a series which together describe and illustrate the meaning and intent of Genesis. Each is self-contained but together they provide the knowledge needed for understanding Genesis, its allegories and their significance. These allegories illustrate and define the difference between good and evil, and the importance of behaviour on social strength, well-being and good life under modern conditions. Genesis begins by describing how the planet was created, in other words how it was formed, the changes which occurred as the planet aged, how plants and animals were formed, evolved and populated the planet. It describes how human beings evolved and also how the behaviour of life forms changed as human beings evolved. When the Pentateuch (Torah, Five Books of Moses) was written about 3,400 years ago, people had but little knowledge about science or evolution compared with what is known today. So concepts for which we now have precise terms were described rather than stated and expressed in religious terms so that they could be appreciated and followed by the population. Understanding this we see that there is no conflict, no contradiction, no divergence, only awe-inspiring agreement, between what is stated in Genesis and what we now know about the evolution of human beings. Chapters 5 and 6 then describe the behaviour of human beings before the flood. There is no conscious knowledge of good and evil and of the difference between them and their behaviour is like that of their primitive ancestors. Their behaviour is stated and condemned as evil. These two chapters of Genesis outline evil behaviour.
The flood follows and from here onwards Genesis shows a conscious knowledge developing of good and evil, stressing consequent reward and punishment, justice and retribution.
The abovementioned reports also summarise corresponding present social problems and describe the Pentateuch's social laws and social system for overcoming them. Further relevant knowledge and information necessary for understanding the meaning of Genesis can be found in the following reports:
How Evolving Life Forms and Human Beings Populated the PlanetWhat flowed out of Eden, what spread out from Eden, were primitive life forms including flesh eating predators. Genesis Chapter 2 records they spread out to lands called Havilah, Cush and Asshur. {1} <1> Chapter 2 continues by describing the evolution of mammalian feelings and family life, of hominoids and Homo erectus (early man) <2>. Genesis then records how human beings evolved {1} and that Homo erectus was replaced by human beings <3>. The flood left only a few survivors {2} and Chapter 10 describes the spreading out of human beings after the flood. The same names which earlier referred to lands to which primitive animals spread out from Eden, namely Havilah, Cush and Asshur, are all mentioned for the second time in Chapter 10. The Behaviour of the Sons of Noah (Genesis Chapter 10)Much effort has been spent in the past in relating the names of the different people listed and mentioned in this chapter to people, tribes, lands or countries. There is no obvious pattern, some of the names are unknown, some names refer to individuals or to communities without clear distinction. But names of people and places are listed in different lines of descent in different generations to tell us that this chapter is about how human beings populated the planet and that they behaved much alike. That on the whole their behaviour was inhuman like that of their primitive ancestors. Genesis Chapter 10 does not distinguish between different types of behaviour. The way in which names are listed to show this can be seen by the following two examples. The three lands mentioned in Chapter 2, namely Havilah, Cush, and Asshur, are here all mentioned for the second time and all together, in the following lines of descent:
Which seems to confirm that this is a record of the 'spreading out' of human beings regardless of descent, regardless of behaviour. That no distinction is at this point being made between the descendants of the sons of Noah is confirmed by:
So Chapter 10 is a record of how the planet was repopulated by people increasing in numbers and spreading out, without distinguishing between good or evil behaviour, without distinguishing between lines of descent from the three sons of Noah as regards behaviour. But a distinction was drawn by Noah between the behaviour of his sons in Chapter 9 of Genesis, particularly between the behaviour of Ham and Shem. This distinction is taken up again at the end of this chapter 10. Noah distinguished between moral and immoral behaviour, and the resulting consequences, stating that 'good' gains strength and 'evil' weakens in accordance with the way people behave. And at the end of Chapter 10, and in Chapter 11, we are told that the world became divided, that a distinction was being drawn between good and evil, some behaving one way, some the other. Differentiating Between Good and Evil (Genesis Chapter 11)In Chapter 10 are listed the descendants of the sons of Noah for up to two generations. One of only two exceptions has just been discussed, namely 'Sheba'. The second exception stands out. Shem's grandson Shelah has a son called Eber who has two sons called Joktan and Peleg. In Chapter 10 are listed the names of thirteen children for Joktan, none for Peleg. But in Chapter 11 are listed the descendants of Peleg for five generations to Abram (the Patriarch), none for Joktan. In addition, we are told: Gen 10: 21 And to Shem, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, to him also were children born. Gen 10: 25 And to Eber were born two sons; the name of the one was Peleg <4>; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother's name was Joktan. In other words, (Gen 10: 21) states that all the descendants of Eber, that is those of Joktan and of Peleg, are descended from Shem and that (Gen 10: 25) in Peleg's days the earth was divided. And in Chapter 11, following the story about the tower of Babel, are listed the descendants of Peleg to Abram (the Patriarch Abraham). So there is a clear division, a separation, between those mentioned in Genesis Chapter 10 and those mentioned in Genesis Chapter 11. Figure 1 From Inhuman to Humane Behaviour after Being ScatteredWhat lies between them are the 'Tower of Babel' events. We are told that as a result people were scattered from there over all lands, that different languages developed and that people ceased to understand each other. So different people would be developing differing customs, traditions, ways of behaving. And some human beings, namely the descendants of Eber's son Peleg, become more and more aware of the difference between primitive inhuman (beastly) behaviour and of humane behaviour. And in the end learned to behave like human beings, as illustrated by the life and travels of the Patriarchs, learned to distinguish between good and evil, learned to behave humanely. {2, 3, 4} And so the world was divided between those who continued to behave much as their primitive ancestors had done, and those who, knowing the difference between good and evil, decided to behave according to what was good, decided to behaved like human beings. Notes and ReferencesNotes
References
Relevant Current and Associated Works
Relevant Subject Index Pages and Site Overview
The Site Overview page has links to all individual Subject Index Pages which between them list the works by Manfred Davidmann which are available on the Internet, with short descriptions and links for downloading. To see the Site Overview page, click Overview Copyright © January 2001 Manfred Davidmann
History Updated 2021:
|