Community Economics: Principlesby Manfred DavidmannCONTENTS
Relevant Current and Associated Works Relevant Subject Index Pages and Site Overview SUMMARYThis statement of fundamental principles allows for basic causes of real-world problems and global needs. There are sections on problems and their causes, on profit motivation, on social responsibility, social costs and social accountability. The roles of owners, directors and managers are described and discussed, as are their social responsibilities and the consequences of irresponsible behaviour. Also discussed are actual rewards and differentials from top to bottom and from young to old. The National Remuneration Pattern is a precise pictorial record of the actual value placed on different kinds of work within the whole community. Manfred Davidmann also lists what is required to make the system work, as well as the controls required to prevent misuse of the system and to protect people. PURPOSE OF ANY ENTERPRISEThe purpose of any enterprise is to satisfy the community's needs by providing high quality goods and services at reasonable prices. The community attempts to ensure that its needs are satisfied by persuading those who can satisfy its needs to do so. It does so by providing reward. Those who can satisfy its needs are motivated by the community towards doing so by the reward, that is by the resulting profit. We refer to this process as 'profit motivation'. PROFIT MOTIVATIONThe way in which profit motivation is intended to function is straightforward, as follows: Someone sees a need for a certain product or service, sees that there is a demand for it, and that a profit can be made by providing it. He then provides the product or service and as he is the sole provider he makes a good profit as a result. Then other people see that a good profit can be made from providing the same goods or services. They do so and this process continues until the supply of these goods or services exceeds the demand at the prices being charged. Unhindered competition between suppliers then results in prices being reduced which in turn results in demand increasing at the new lower price. Lower prices mean lower profit margins but the increase in demand can maintain and even improve profits by increasing the sales volume. At the same time enterprises which may be badly managed or which offer inferior products, would become uncompetitive and cease to trade in this product or service. In this way the community attempts to ensure that its needs are satisfied at reasonable prices, that it gets good value for money. Different kinds of enterprises are thus formed for satisfying the needs of the community by providing high quality goods and services at reasonable prices. What matters is the value of the service to the community. The measure of success is not the 'profit' or financial gain taken by owners, no matter whether private or state, but is the 'gain to the community'. The real profit or gain any enterprise achieves is the gain which the community obtains as a result of the enterprise's operations. Thus the social costs, that is the costs to the community of any operation, have to be taken into account. {1} REAL-WORLD PROBLEMSFor the free-market economic system to work, it is essential that prices are allowed to float unhindered according to the unhindered natural balance between supply and demand, within limits set to protect the community. This means that there must be free unhindered competition. It also means that profit margins and prices need to be controlled effectively so as to protect the community from exploitation. But enterprises are not only formed by people who care for other people and who are motivated by the intensity of the need, but also by those who care only for personal gain in wealth and power over others and who are motivated by this. So we have enterprises being formed which are generally managed by directors who are appointed by the owners. It is the directors who generally take the key decisions on behalf of the owners. At times owners may appoint themselves as directors. Problems arise when owners, directors or managers are either unaware of, or ignore, their purpose which is to satisfy the needs of the community with profit resulting from giving good value for money. To them profit then becomes an overriding and sole objective and they concentrate on maximising profits regardless of the cost to others, regardless of the cost and consequences to the community. Profits can be increased by reducing labour costs, for example. Those wishing to increase profits regardless of the cost to others, will thus aim to reduce the standard of living of the working population, will aim to increase the needs of the working population so that people will work for less. {1} The National Remuneration Pattern {3} is a precise pictorial record of the differentials within a country, from top to bottom, from young to old. It shows the relative value placed on different kinds of work. At the top are the owners or those who work directly for them, at the bottom is the mass of wage-earners. The pattern of differentials shows that what is rewarded is service to the owners and their establishment rather than ability and service to the community. Putting the interests of the owners and of their representatives before that of the community is the main cause of our deteriorating environment and of our deteriorating quality of life. People should be rewarded in accordance with the benefits which result to the community. When it comes to incomes and wealth one should limit differentials. To make sure that people do not harm and exploit each other one has to ensure that nobody can profit or gain from manipulation or from harming people. A hidden process is taking place by which purchasing power is being transferred from the bottom to the top. It is being transferred from those who can least afford to reduce their standard of living, to those at the other end to whom the extra purchasing power means greater luxury. Poverty and differentials increase even when there is full employment in an affluent society. This process is undermining the internal strength of our society and those who see themselves in real and in relative poverty complain, demonstrate, organise and disrupt. We need to become aware of processes which redistribute income. We need to see what is actually happening, the extent to which it is taking place, and what the effects are. It follows beyond doubt that loyalty to those who put profit above other considerations is harming the community. {1} Confrontation then results between those who own or control enterprises on the one hand, and the community on the other. An intense struggle then develops. Pressure exerted by concerned groups results in legal restraint or in compensation having to be paid. The aim of the struggle is to ensure that profits are made only from serving the community, that profits are not extracted at the expense of the community. The aim is to ensure that socially irresponsible behaviour does not pay. The consequences of socially irresponsible behaviour are now such that they threaten the survival of people as people. Hence the vital importance of pressure groups and of means which enable them to make their opinions felt. Responsible leadership aims to eliminate need so as to eliminate exploitation through need, wants the highest possible standard of living and social security for the people. {1} SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYA comprehensive and relevant survey and discussion of Social Responsibility was published some time ago under the title 'Social Responsibility, Profits and Social Accountability' {1}. Much of what now follows has been reproduced from this. Incidents and case-studies in fields such as chemical and radioactive pollution, side-effects of drugs, industrial and nuclear accidents, were studied together to find the pattern of events and basic causes. The report showed that we are faced with a sequence of incidents, disasters and catastrophes which are increasing in frequency and in severity, affecting more and more people. It isolated and described the basic causes and showed how the problem could be overcome. This was the first time that anyone had been able to discern, describe and prove the trend of events, isolate causes and provide remedies. The report became widely accepted and had considerable impact. It showed that decisions taken by directors and managers affect the community, affect the quality of life, and indeed affect peoples' health and safety over a widening area. When a person is given work to do, then he is responsible for doing it and for the way in which he does it. This means that he is held accountable and held to account for what he does or fails to do and for the way in which he does it. This is the meaning of 'responsibility'. Hence when we are talking about the 'social responsibilities of directors and managers' then we are talking about their responsibilities towards society, that is towards the community. The purpose of enterprises is to satisfy the needs of the community so that in the end directors and managers are working for the community and are accountable to the community for the way in which this work is done. In other words, directors and managers are responsible to the community for what they do, are accountable to the community for the results of their work and for the way in which such results are achieved. In practice directors are generally required by man-made laws to act first and foremost in the interests of the owners, so that it is profit which is maximised. Short-term and long-term profits can be and are being maximised regardless of the cost to others, that is regardless of the cost to the community. Profits are maximised regardless of the cost to the community, limited only by the likelihood of unpleasant consequences. <1> {1} It follows that the work of directors and managers has to be assessed from the point of view of the extent to which their work either serves or harms the community. We are here considering the high cost of putting profits first. What we see are the effects of speeding on in the search for profits either negligently unaware of the dangers or else without concern about likely or possible consequences to the community. SOCIAL COSTSManagers continually assess the reliability of their information and the likely consequences arising from alternative courses of action. Managers tend to err on the side of safety and their promotion generally depends on this. In other words, 'responsible' managers err on the side of safety from the point of view of those to whom they are accountable. That is they act to protect and advance the interests of the owners who pay their salaries instead of first and foremost protecting and advancing the interests of the community. Here is an example: Purifying a harmful effluent increases costs and so reduces profits. Hence discharging unpurified effluent is more profitable to the producer but the community has to suffer the consequences. It is the community which would have to pay for cleaning up the pollution, for undoing the damage done. Cleaning up pollution costs money, but failing to do so has costly consequences. In other words, by discharging an untreated harmful effluent the enterprise is making a profit from passing on to the community part of its operating costs. Social costs have been defined {2} as:
Just how is the balance drawn, to what extent are social costs actually included in the economic analysis of alternative proposals or schemes? As said before, the social costs, that is the costs to the community of any operation, have to be taken into account. {1} SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITYIf the government only acts to protect the community as a result of pressure from the community, then there have to be ways and means for creating such pressure, there have to be ways and means for all to have access to the mass media and to the people. The facts have to become known. But how can one ensure that those in important positions become aware that they are accountable to the community and how can one make them accountable to the community? The phrase 'the polluter pays' sums up popular feeling about how to right past wrongs, about how to hold to account those whose profits are made at the expense of the community and those who benefit from antisocial activities. In reality, it is the customer who is made to pay because enterprises recover any cleaning-up costs and compensation payments by increasing their prices. The owners appoint directors to take decisions on behalf of the owners, with the directors in turn appointing senior managers to have the decisions carried out. Hence it would seem to be the owners and/or directors who should be held accountable, who should pay, and they should not be permitted to pass cleaning-up costs and compensation payments on to their customers. We are here considering antisocial activities, antisocial incidents, and the taking of antisocial decisions. It would be up to the owners to hold to account their directors and senior managers for the extent to which the enterprises' antisocial activities were contrary to the declared wishes of the owners. However, directors are often owners and if directors and senior managers are not held to account by owners, then they and the owners need to be held to account by the community applying full legal sanctions. The community would also need to consider disqualifying from holding office or employment those responsible for antisocial activities, for antisocial incidents, for taking antisocial decisions. One method is to publicise the names of those who made the relevant decisions, who condoned the decisions and resulting actions, who carried them out, who failed to stop them from being carried out. We have known for some time {1} that we are now facing an increasing number of disasters and catastrophes which are increasing in frequency and in severity, affecting more and more people. The interests of the whole community are at stake to an increasing extent. There is thus the daily increasing need for those who work to be responsible to, that is accountable to, the community for the way in which they do their work and for the resulting consequences. The rising incidence of leukaemia caused by nuclear weapons testing showed that there is a point at which the interests of the community must and do take precedence over the politics of power and the interests of the owners. But this only happens when people act and co-operate with each other by using the courts, by forming pressure groups to impress the leadership with the strength of the feeling of the people locally or countrywide, by demonstrating if necessary to get the required legislation where it does not exist already. Such considerations point to the need for access to publicity by all groups and shades of opinion and there have to be recognised channels which make this available to everyone. After all, if one does not evaluate performance then how can good and outstanding performance be rewarded appropriately? {1} NOTES AND REFERENCESNOTES
REFERENCES
Relevant Current and Associated Works
Relevant Subject Index Pages and Site Overview
The Site Overview page has links to all individual Subject Index Pages which between them list the works by Manfred Davidmann which are available on the Internet, with short descriptions and links for downloading. To see the Site Overview page, click Overview Copyright © 1992, 1996 Manfred Davidmann
History Updated 2021 - the following links were added:
|